Middle America's Worldview

Q: How have new discoveries about the human embryo forced pro-choice advocates to rethink their arguments?

A: It's fascinating what modern science has discovered. Electron microscopes can produce images of embryos at every stage of a baby's development. For years,
abortionists have said that the early embryo is just a "ball of cells ... not a
human being."

It appears that, even after the first cell division, the cells differentiate between the top and tail position, and all future cells seem to adopt a similar orientation.

The details aren't yet fully understood, but it's clear that the "blob" theory has no basis in reality. On the other hand, the Bible's teaching still stands. Genesis teaches that God created man in His image, and a newly conceived child is fully human.
As usual, the scientific evidence makes much more sense if you accept the Word of God as your authority, and then build your thinking from that foundation.

===========
Evolutionist quote of the week

According to this "blob" theory, the cells were all the same, and none had yet become hair,
blood, etc. But research has since found that cells begin to take on special purposes on the
day of conception!
============

"By the end of the eighth week, the face resembles a primate, but is still not quite human."

– Carl Sagan, Is It Possible To Be Pro-Life and Pro-Choice, Parade Magazine, April 22, 1990, p. 6.


Is the Human Embryo Essentially a Fish with Gills?

Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust

BC-02. From Malthus and Darwin to Eugenics

Embryology and Evolution


Some teachers and textbooks still are presenting a simplistic nineteenth century Darwinian hypothesis that a developing embryo summarizes the evolutionary history of that organism. Mainstream embryologists have rejected this view, called recapitulation, for more than one-half century.

The above quote is what I find interesting. News seem to tell the public how much science and technology has advanced, but the ideology of evolution remains to be the same in most teachers. I had heard if you take a person from history, say around 1500, and bring him in the present, they would feel more comfortable in a public classroom then anywhere else. The reason is due to the classrooms having not move forward.

It appears regardless of the advance in Embryology and knowledge showing life at earlier stages, evolutionist still keep hold on their faith of darwinism. This is a shame when you consider how racist the theory of evolution is.